Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Abstract
Beyond the varying opinions and critiques of the BCS, a more fundamental issue regarding the system is whether it is legal. Specifically, does it violate the antitrust laws? This is not a specious question. The Senate Judiciary Committee conducted hearings on the legality of the BCS in October 2003, and the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection conducted similar hearings in December 2005. Another important aspect of the BCS is its prominent place as a visual symptom of America's winner-take-all society. Is extreme competition, where everyone strives to be the best but very few actually achieve that goal, a good thing for our society? Is our cultural predilection for excessive competition helpful or harmful to individual initiative, achievement, and satisfaction? These two fundamental issues, the legality of the BCS and the larger cultural issue regarding the winner-take-all society are symmetrical in a way. The initial question is whether the BCS stands as an abuse of accepted methods of economic competition as regulated by the antitrust laws, while the second issue focuses more broadly on whether the BCS is symptomatic of the excesses of competition in our society at large.
Publication Title
Marquette Sports Law Review
Document Type
Article
Recommended Citation
C. Paul III Rogers, The Quest for Number One in College Football: The Revised Bowl Championship Series, Antitrust, and the Winner Take all Syndrome, 18 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 285 (2008)
