Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

ORCID (Links to author’s additional scholarship at ORCID.org)



This Essay seeks to answer two interrelated questions about regnant maritime choice of law analysis in the United States: Does it descriptively capture international law as the United States claims? And, if so, is such an approach a good one? In so doing, it aims principally to provide national and international decision makers with a robust and fresh resource for resolving these disputes in a manner, I argue, beneficent to overall social welfare and peaceful relations among states. For only by analyzing the United States’ claim can we tell whether it is true and thus, whether it needs to be adhered to or modified. The answer to this latter inquiry is directly informed by whether we think an international law analysis is the best way forward, what that way forward may look like, and perhaps even to make recommendations to that analysis based on emergent practices.

The Essay argues that U.S. maritime choice of law rules largely reflect international law and practice and that this approach is a normative good because it promotes peace and trade among nations. More specifically, an international approach takes into consideration not just the forum’s interest in resolving the dispute according to its own parochial polices and choice of law methodologies, but also the interests of other involved states, thereby furthering the smooth working of the international system and peaceful relations among states. Furthermore, it provides a common choice of law methodology for all states which increases primary predictability by legal actors engaged in behavior generally considered beneficent to overall social welfare, like international trade. These features of promoting peace and trade comport with a systems theory of international law under which rules evolve so as to perpetuate the system. Courts confronted with maritime conflicts cases should engage in deeper analysis of state and international interests with these objectives in mind.

Publication Title

Arizona Law Review

Document Type



Maritime law in the United States, International law, Conflict of laws, Maritime disputes



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.