Abstract

In this project, I analyze how the line between good and bad religions, as constructed through secularism, influenced whether or not practitioners of religion were sent to insane asylums or, at least, considered by their peers or family to be at risk of insanity or on the brink of it. Exploring these questions revealed the link between religion and insanity but also showed how some religious practices (especially ecstatic behavior) placed believers at even greater risk because of the threat to the secular and progressive narrative encouraged by the people around them.

By placing the asylum narrative in conversation with the broader experiences of religious ecstaticism in the Holiness and Spiritualism movements, this project brings the patients of the asylum and the revelers of religious melancholy into a new light. Religious insanity no longer can be reduced to something that happened in the asylum. Instead, it is a fluid series of events that happen in the everyday crises of believers. The regulations around those who go into asylums, and those who do not, were determined by social expectations and a world shaped by secularism.

Degree Date

Winter 12-19-2020

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Department

Religious Studies

Advisor

Kate Carté

Second Advisor

Jill DeTemple

Third Advisor

Rick Cogley

Fourth Advisor

Tisa Wenger

Subject Area

History, Humanities, Religion

Number of Pages

249

Format

.pdf

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Available for download on Sunday, December 07, 2025

Share

COinS