"The Validity of Consequential Damage Disclaimers Following Failure of " by John V. Jansonius

Home > Dedman School of Law > Law Journals > SMU Law Review > Vol. 33 (1979) > Iss. 3

Article Title

The Validity of Consequential Damage Disclaimers Following Failure of Essential Purpose of an Exclusive Remedy: S.M. Wilson & (and) Co. v. Smith International, Inc.

Authors

John V. Jansonius

Recommended Citation

John V. Jansonius, The Validity of Consequential Damage Disclaimers Following Failure of Essential Purpose of an Exclusive Remedy: S.M. Wilson & (and) Co. v. Smith International, Inc., 33 Sw L.J. 930 (1979)
https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol33/iss3/9

Download

COinS

Journal Home
Association Home
Editorial Board
Submissions
Dedman School of Law

Most Popular Papers
Receive Email Notices or RSS

Select an issue:

Advanced Search

ISSN: 1066-1271

SMU Law Review

Article Title

Authors

Recommended Citation

Share