A growing literature has explored the workability and efficacy of governance without the state. The difficulties typically raised in the context of these studies concern under which conditions cooperation or Hobbesian chaos would arise in the absence of a monopolist of coercion. This paper challenges the idea of the stateless society from another vantage point, arguing the institutions articulated by proponents of the stateless society would struggle at reconciling heterogeneous views regarding the rights of third parties. This is relevant for many of the most contentious policy debates, such as abortion and animal rights.
Anarcho-capitalism, taboo tradeoffs, repugnancy costs
Libertarian Papers 7, no. 1
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Murphy, Ryan, "Heterogeneous Moral Views in the Stateless Society" (2015). O'Neil Center for Global Markets and Freedom Research. 10.