Publication Date
2023
Abstract
Supplementing our paper "Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?" [1], we furnish and analyze the evidence of AI-induced contamination of the scientific literature that we alluded to in Section 2 of the paper (Section 1 below). We also provide a comprehensive list of references, encompassing the titles in the bibliography of [1], the titles cited in [1], but not included in the bibliography, and the titles cited in Section 1 below, but not in [1]. Further, we summarize two specific conversations with ChatGPT, corroborating the observations in Section 3 of our paper (Sections 2 and 3 below). Full transcripts of these conversations are provided in Sections 4 and 5. The transcripts have not been edited, except for the remediation of formatting issues and the removal of some irrelevant passages, such as system messages about temporary unavailability of the service or incomplete questions submitted by mistake.
_________________
[1] P. G. Schmidt and A. J. Meir, Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?, Manuscript, accepted for publication in: Notices of the AMS
Document Type
Other
Disciplines
Mathematics | Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Recommended Citation
Schmidt, Paul G. and Meir, Amnon J., "Supplementary Material for the Article “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?"" (2023). Mathematics Research. 9.
https://scholar.smu.edu/hum_sci_mathematics_research/9
