Bordering on Solutions: A Comparative Study of Mexican and U.S. Policies to Address Human Trafficking along the Mexico-United States Border

Authors

Taylor Rosenbleeth, Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law

Abstract

Mexico and the United States both contend with the issue of human trafficking and implement measures to address this prevalent challenge, not only within their respective territories, but also along their shared border region. Despite significant efforts, both nations encounter obstacles in their anti-trafficking endeavors. The U.S. promotes a comprehensive legal framework, exemplified by the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, yet faces criticism regarding deportation policies and inadequate victim support mechanisms. In contrast, Mexico has demonstrated progress through legislative advancements such as the 2012 anti-trafficking law and initiatives like the "Blue Heart" campaign, yet the country struggles with challenges in law enforcement coordination and media portrayal accuracy. International collaborations, including treaties like the Palermo Protocol and initiatives such as the Polaris Project, facilitate cross-border cooperation. But, there remains a pressing need for enhanced victim assistance, improved accessibility to legal aid, and intensified public awareness campaigns. This case note underscores the necessity of collaborative efforts between Mexico and the U.S. to effectively combat human trafficking. It advocates for legislative reforms that prioritize victim-centered approaches and comprehensive public engagement strategies, aiming to foster a safer and more just border region for all individuals involved.

Recommended Citation

Taylor Rosenbleeth, Case Note, Bordering on Solutions: A Comparative Study of Mexican and U.S. Policies to Address Human Trafficking along the Mexico-United States Border, ILRA Student Forum (2023)