Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
ORCID (Links to author’s additional scholarship at ORCID.org)
Abstract
Jury impartiality in the contemporary court often justifies the perpetuation
of exclusionary selection practices that make juries more—not less—biased.
This Article calls for a rethinking of this important but flawed concept. Constitutional
interpretations and conceptions of “impartiality” frame it as a transient
orientation toward particular evidence or parties. Yet, during voir dire, the prevailing
conception of jury impartiality is that it is an immutable character trait
that must be discovered—if not created—by professional legal actors. What voir
dire creates is not an impartial jury, but precisely the opposite: a venire shaped
by the strategic biases of lawyers.
This Article offers an alternative. The presumption of impartiality applied
to judges should inspire a new approach to their lay counterparts. The norms of
judicial impartiality show that the criminal legal system largely assumes judges
are, unless shown otherwise, impartial actors who deserve discretion to decide
whether their relationship to a case warrants recusal. In this way, impartiality is
something a legal actor must take responsibility for in their role in the trial. Prospective
jurors should be empowered in the same way. By reforming voir dire
techniques already in use, courts can hold jurors to a comparable standard of
impartiality and dispense with the advantage-seeking ethos of jury selection that
allows lawyers to impute partiality to prospective jurors. This reform will help
juries realize an ideal of impartiality premised on representativeness rather than
exclusion and empower jurors to take greater responsibility for their special role in
the legal process.
Publication Title
George Washington Law Review
Document Type
Article
Keywords
juror impartiality, voir dire, jury selection, judicial impartiality, criminal procedure, courts, jurors, Sixth Amendment
Recommended Citation
Anna Offit, Rethinking Juror Impartiality, 93 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1386 (2025)
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Society Commons
