False Rubicons, Moral Panic & Conceptual Cul-De-Sacs: Critiquing & Reframing the Call to Ban Lethal Autonomous Weapons

Authors

Chris Jenks, Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of LawFollow

Abstract

Casting into the indeterminate future and projecting visions of so-called killer robots, The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots (The Campaign) has incited moral panic in an attempt to stimulate a discussion and ultimately a ban on lethal autonomous weapons (LAWS). Their efforts have been superficially successful but come at a self-defeating substantive cost. In the hope of shifting the dialogue from the hyperbolic to a constructive dialogue on the interaction between human and machine abilities in both current and future weapon systems, this article explores the conceptual paradox implicit in The Campaign and proposes an alternative.

Having provoked the international community to envision potential, future and dire harm from LAWS, the called for ban would include not only future “fully autonomous” weapons systems which don’t (and may never) exist but some unspecified portion of current weapon systems. That’s because the real issue, the real concern, is (or should be) autonomy in certain functions, notably selecting and engaging targets, essentially determining what to fire at and then firing. But weapon systems that select and engage targets without further human intervention have been in use by over thirty countries since 1980. Having rallied the world to worry about possible future harms, The Campaign is unable to differentiate and specify which current system should be included in the ban. The result is that the LAWS debate at the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) has stagnated.

This article explains autonomy in general and as applied to weapon systems. From there the article examines The Campaign’s two primary source documents, reports on LAWS by Human Rights Watch and also a United Nations Special Rapporteur. After explaining the conceptual and practical flaws with The Campaign’s approach, I propose an alternative, a moratorium on LAWS primary designed to lethally target personnel.

Publication Title

Pepperdine Law Review

Document Type

Article

Keywords

Killer robots, LAWS, The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, Lethal Autonomous Weapons, robot, United Nations, Special Rapporteur, moral panic, uncanny valley, CCW, convention on certain conventional weapons

Recommended Citation

Chris Jenks, False Rubicons, Moral Panic, & Conceptual Cul-De-Sacs: Critiquing & Reframing the Call to Ban Lethal Autonomous Weapons, 44 PEPP. L. REV. 1 (2016)