Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Abstract
It has long been known that most of the private law content of the Theodosian Code has not been preserved independently of the Lex Romana Visigothorum, or Breviary of Alaric. Certain constitutions, not contained in the Breviary but dating to the period covered by the Theodosian Code, have survived in the Code of Justinian. There has been debate, however, as to whether all of these constitutions were contained in the Theodosian Code.
This Article discusses this problem with respect to a particular topic: fideicommissa. The Article considers whether a particular constitution, CJ 6.37.21, might have been included in the Theodosian Code either as part of a general rubric concerning inheritance or as part of a separate rubric on fideicommissa, and concludes by suggesting what the constitution might have looked like had it been included under a separate heading.
Publication Title
Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Legal History Review
Document Type
Article
Keywords
trusts, Roman law, legal history
Recommended Citation
Joshua C. Tate, Codification of Late Roman Inheritance Law: Fideicommissa and the Theodosian Code, 76 Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis