Pennoyer Strikes Back: Personal Jurisdiction in a Global Age

Authors

William V. Dorsaneo III, Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of LawFollow

Abstract

The primary purpose of this Article is to evaluate the four most recent Supreme Court decisions on personal jurisdiction and situate those decisions within the history of Supreme Court personal jurisdiction jurisprudence. Starting with the seminal case of Pennoyer v. Neff, personal jurisdiction jurisprudence has been remarkably kaleidoscopic,with the Supreme Court intervening at various intervals to redefine the law in broad strokes, while zigzagging from one doctrinal position to another and thereby leaving lower courts to hash out the application of an evolving personal jurisdiction doctrine to varying fact patterns. I will divide this jurisprudential history into two main groups of cases after Pennoyer was superseded by the modern minimum contacts approach. The first group of decisions begins with International Shoe Co. v. Washington and continues through Hanson v. Denckla. The second group begins almost two decades later with Shaffer v. Heitner and continues through Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court and Burnham v. Superior Court.

Publication Title

Texas A&M Law Review

Document Type

Article

Recommended Citation

William V. Dorsaneo, III, Pennoyer Strikes Back: Personal Jurisdiction in a Global Age, 3 Tex. A&M L. Rev. 1 (2015)