Home > Dedman School of Law > Law Journals > SMU Law Review > Vol. 71 (2018) > Texas Gulf Sulphur 50th Anniversary Symposium Issue
SMU Law Review
Texas Gulf Sulphur 50th Anniversary Symposium Issue
Front Matter
Articles
Texas Gulf Sulphur at Fifty—A Contemporary and Historical PerspectiveMarc I. Steinberg625
Equal Access to Information: The Fraud at the Heart of Texas Gulf SulphurStephen M. Bainbridge643
From TGS Conservatorships to Sarbanes-Oxley Fair FundsRichard M. Buxbaum653
Texas Gulf Sulphur: A Case Study on Responding to Market RumorsWendy G. Couture675
Texas Gulf Sulphur and Information Disclosure PolicyOnnig H. Dombalagian713
From Equality to Duty: On Altering the Reach, Impact, and Meaning of the Texas Gulf LegacyLisa M. Fairfax729
Personal Benefit Has No Place in Misappropriation Tipping CasesMerritt B. Fox and George N. Tepe767
Insider TradingTamar Frankel783
Will Fifty Years of the SEC’s Disgorgement Remedy Be Abolished?Roberta S. Karmel799
From Texas Gulf Sulphur to Laudato Si’: Mining Equitable Principles from Insider Trading LawMichael J. Kaufman811
From Texas Gulf Sulphur to Chiarella: A Tale of Two DutiesDonald C. Langevoort835
Thinking Fast and Slow About the Concept of MaterialityMark J. Loewenstein853
Martoma and Newman: Valid Corporate Purpose and the Personal Benefit TestJonathan R. Macey869
Taming Rule 10b-5-1: The Unfinished Business of Texas Gulf SulphurDaniel J. Morrissey883
Texas Gulf Sulphur and the Genesis of Corporate Liability Under Rule 10b-5Adam C. Pritchard and Robert Thompson927
Unintended Consequences: The Link Between Judge Friendly’s Texas Gulf Sulphur Concurrence and Recent Supreme Court Decisions Misconstruing Rule 10b-5Margaret V. Sachs947
The Coasian Firm and Insider Trading, RevisitedJames C. Spindler967
A Birthday Toast to Texas Gulf SulphurManning G. Warren III987
Disgorgement in Insider Trading Cases: FY2005-FY2015Verity Winship999
