Toward a Unified Law of Damages
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe and test the hypothesis that the law of remedies rests upon certain foundational principles, and that these principles can be summarized in terms of formulas with universal application. It is suggested that this is the result of certain historical accidents, relating to the structure of the common law court systems, which led to the integration of economic principles into the fabric of the common law. As a result, the common law remedies are based on economic principles which, as descriptive of human behavior, have remained fundamentally unchanged for hundreds of years and remain universally applicable today.
Part I describes the institutional histories which led to this phenomenon. Part II summarizes the legal concepts that developed as a consequence. Part III investigates the links between these concepts and economic principles. Finally, part IV considers a formulized embodiment of the foregoing analysis. The result is a unified theory of damages. Parts V and VI then seek to test this hypothesis for the damages remedies, by reference to case law and other authorities and commentators. Parts VII and VIII examine the possibility of extending the theory to the reliance and restitution remedies, thereby describing a unified law of remedies.
Subject Area
Law
Degree Date
1981
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
LL.M.
Department
Dedman School of Law
Advisor
Roy Anderson
Second Advisor
A. J. Thomas, Jr.
Number of Pages
x, 460
Recommended Citation
Harrell, Alvin C., "Toward a Unified Law of Damages" (1981). Theses and Dissertations. 23.
https://scholar.smu.edu/law_etds/23
